A Place To Candidly Discuss Issues That Relate To Christianity

Archive for July, 2009

Will People Really Burn In Hell For Eternity?

In Bible, Theology on July 16, 2009 at 8:43 pm

by Elizabeth K

See the original post with lively comments at my other blog on Vox.

The Biblical understanding of hell has been one of the greatest controversies throughout church history.  The issue has undergone many debates.  The traditional view over the centuries has been generally a picture of a dark cave on fire, filled with unimaginable physical torment that never ends and is irrevocable.  It has been the subject of famous sermons and comic strips alike.

Since we are speaking about existence after death, that great unknown, we must rely primarily upon prophecy.  Few other documents give us as much solid and consistent insight as the Holy Bible, although those truths can be difficult to comprehend.

In my limited study of the issue, I’ve been compelled to look at differing viewpoints such as Conditionalism, that souls are naturally mortal unless granted immortality by God; Annihilationism, the belief that sinners are completely destroyed either before or after a time of punishment; and Universalism, that all humans will eventually be reconciled to God and saved from hell in the afterlife.  All of these views have been supported by theologians and Bible scholars, some greatly renown…. Read the rest of this entry »

Who Owns The Institution Of Marriage?

In People, Politics on July 4, 2009 at 11:20 pm

by Elizabeth K

I realized a few things while reading an article on marriage from a Christian ministry that I consider trustworthy, but like every spokesperson(s) for God, is also a very far cry from perfect.  No Greater Joy provides profound, biblical, and often unconventional wisdom, especially for families, but there is a string of extreme Christian legalism that runs throughout their publications as well.

While this particular article spoke of the institution of marriage as inaugurated from God Himself in the Garden of Eden, the point was that marriage is between one man and one woman, and, therefore ought to be guarded as such in current American legislature.  The tone was the usual reprimanding of us Christians who have allowed government to have control over the private nature of the marriage covenant; if the state can issue a license for something, it can also forbid or regulate it.

I thought this was an insightful point.

For the first six thousand years of recorded human history, marriage was regarded as a personal decision usually shared with friends and family.  The sanction of the church or the state was never sought until the Roman Catholic church ruled at the Council of Trent that a Protestant marriage is not valid unless performed by a Catholic priest in the presence of two witnesses.  Protestants then looked to the state to confirm their marriages; thus the current marital tradition was born… Read the rest of this entry »